PETG vs PLA vs ABS: 3D Printing Strength Comparison

3D printing has revolutionized manufacturing by enabling the creation of complex parts with a wide range of materials. While there are a wide range of different 3D printing materials, in this article, we will examine 3 of the more common materials and compare their strength and performance.

If you are looking for a low friction and wear-resistant filament to replace materials such as POM, get familiar with UltiMaker’s new invention, Nylon CF Slide, for industrial applications.

Introduction to 3D printing materials and strength

When it comes to producing functional and durable 3D printed objects, understanding the strength characteristics of different materials is crucial. The three most commonly used thermoplastics in 3D printing are PLA (Polylactic Acid), ABS (Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene), and PETG (Polyethylene Terephthalate Glycol-modified).

Each of these materials offers distinct advantages in terms of strength and printability:

• PLA is known for its high tensile strength and ease of printing, making it popular for prototypes and decorative items. However, it has lower impact resistance and heat tolerance compared to other materials.
• ABS provides good impact resistance and heat tolerance, making it suitable for functional parts. It can be more challenging to print due to warping tendencies.
• PETG offers a balance between the strength of ABS and the printability of PLA, with good layer adhesion and chemical resistance.

When evaluating 3D printing strength, several key factors come into play:

• Tensile strength: The maximum stress a material can withstand while being stretched before breaking
• Impact resistance: The ability to absorb shock without fracturing
• Layer adhesion: How well the printed layers bond together, affecting overall part strength
• Heat resistance: The ability to maintain structural integrity at elevated temperatures

Understanding these properties is essential for selecting the right material for specific applications. For example, PLA strength may be sufficient for low-stress applications, while ABS or PETG might be preferred for parts requiring higher durability or heat resistance. Learning about stiff and strong materials can help you make informed decisions when choosing 3D printing materials.

In addition to material selection, other factors influence the strength of 3D printed parts:

• Print settings (layer height, infill density, shell thickness)
• Part orientation during printing
• Post-processing techniques (annealing, coating)

By considering these factors and understanding material properties, designers and engineers can optimize their 3D printed parts for strength and performance across a wide range of applications.

PETG vs PLA - key differences in strength and properties

Building on our understanding of 3D printing materials, let's delve deeper into the specific strengths and properties of PETG and PLA. When comparing PETG vs PLA*, there are several key differences to consider:

Tensile strength

PLA typically has a higher tensile strength than PETG, with values around 50-60 MPa compared to 40-50 MPa for PETG. This means PLA can withstand greater pulling forces before breaking. However, PETG is stronger than PLA in other important ways.

Impact resistance

PETG has significantly better impact resistance than PLA. It is less brittle and can absorb more energy from sudden impacts without shattering. This makes PETG more suitable for parts that may experience shocks or drops.

Flexibility

PETG is more flexible than PLA, with a lower flexural modulus. This allows PETG parts to bend slightly under load without breaking, while PLA tends to be more rigid.

Temperature resistance

PETG has a higher heat deflection temperature than PLA, typically around 70°C compared to 55°C for PLA. This means PETG parts can withstand higher temperatures before deforming.

Chemical resistance

PETG offers better resistance to chemicals, oils, and UV light compared to PLA. This makes it more suitable for outdoor use or applications involving exposure to solvents.

Layer adhesion

PETG generally has stronger layer adhesion than PLA, resulting in parts with better strength between printed layers. This can lead to improved overall part strength, especially for loads applied perpendicular to the print layers.

Printability

While both materials are relatively easy to print, PLA is generally considered easier to work with. It has a lower printing temperature, less tendency to warp, and doesn't require a heated bed. PETG can be more challenging but offers better strength and durability in the final parts.

In summary, while PLA has higher tensile strength, PETG is stronger than PLA in terms of impact resistance, flexibility, temperature resistance, and overall durability. The choice between these materials depends on the specific requirements of the application, balancing factors like strength, ease of printing, and environmental conditions. To learn more about the strongest 3D printing materials available, you can explore this comprehensive guide.

PLA vs ABS vs PETG - comprehensive strength analysis

Now that we've compared PETG and PLA, let's expand our analysis to include ABS, providing a comprehensive comparison of these three popular 3D printing materials. When comparing the strength characteristics of PLA vs ABS vs PETG, it's important to consider multiple factors that contribute to overall material performance.

Tensile strength

PLA typically exhibits the highest tensile strength of the three materials, with values around 50-60 MPa. PETG follows closely behind at 40-50 MPa, while ABS has the lowest tensile strength at 34-36 MPa. This means PLA can withstand greater pulling forces before breaking. However, tensile strength alone does not tell the full story of material performance.

Impact resistance

When it comes to impact resistance, ABS is stronger than PLA. ABS has superior toughness and can absorb more energy from sudden impacts without shattering. PETG falls between PLA and ABS in terms of impact strength, offering a good balance of properties. This makes ABS and PETG better choices for parts that may experience shocks or drops.

Heat resistance

ABS demonstrates the highest heat resistance of the three materials, with a heat deflection temperature around 98°C. PETG follows with a heat deflection temperature of about 70°C, while PLA has the lowest at approximately 55°C. This means ABS parts can maintain their structural integrity at higher temperatures compared to PETG and PLA.

Layer adhesion

PETG generally exhibits the strongest layer adhesion, resulting in parts with better strength between printed layers. This can lead to improved overall part strength, especially for loads applied perpendicular to the print layers. ABS typically has good layer adhesion as well, while PLA can sometimes struggle with layer bonding, particularly at lower print temperatures.

Flexibility and ductility

Of the three materials, PETG offers the best balance of strength and flexibility. It can bend slightly under load without breaking, making it suitable for applications requiring some give. ABS is also relatively flexible, while PLA tends to be more rigid and brittle.

Chemical resistance

ABS and PETG both offer good resistance to many chemicals and solvents, outperforming PLA in this aspect. This makes them more suitable for parts that may come into contact with various substances or be used in outdoor environments.

Printability and strength optimization

While material properties are crucial, the strength of 3D printed parts also depends heavily on print settings and design considerations:

• PLA is the easiest to print, allowing for higher quality prints that can maximize its inherent strength
• ABS requires higher temperatures and can be prone to warping, but proper print settings can yield very strong parts
• PETG strikes a balance between ease of printing and strength, often producing robust parts with minimal tweaking

In conclusion, when considering PLA vs ABS vs PETG for strength-critical applications, each material has its strengths and weaknesses. PLA offers high tensile strength and ease of printing, ABS provides good impact resistance and heat tolerance, while PETG balances strength, flexibility, and printability.

The choice between these materials should be based on the specific requirements of the intended application, taking into account factors such as expected loads, environmental conditions, and ease of manufacturing.

For a deeper dive into material properties and strengths, you can check out this detailed comparison.

Understanding tensile strength in 3D printing

Having compared the overall strength characteristics of PLA, ABS, and PETG, let's focus on one of the most important metrics: tensile strength. Tensile strength is a crucial property to consider when evaluating the performance of 3D printer filaments. It measures the maximum stress a material can withstand while being stretched or pulled before breaking. For 3D printed parts, high tensile strength indicates better resistance to forces that try to pull the object apart.

When comparing different filament materials, tensile strength is typically measured in megapascals (MPa). Based on available data, here is a general 3D printer filament strength chart showing approximate tensile strength values for common materials:

• PLA: 50-60 MPa
• PETG: 40-50 MPa
• ABS: 34-36 MPa
• Nylon: 50-80 MPa
• Polycarbonate (PC): 60-70 MPa

It's important to note that PLA tensile strength is surprisingly high compared to other common filaments. However, PLA is also quite brittle, so it may not be suitable for applications requiring flexibility or impact resistance despite its high tensile strength. To learn more about the strength of different filaments and how they compare, you can explore this detailed strength comparison.

Factors that can affect the tensile strength of 3D printed parts include:

• Print orientation - Parts are typically strongest when forces align with the layer direction
• Layer adhesion - Poor layer bonding reduces overall part strength
• Infill percentage - Higher infill generally increases strength
• Print temperature - Proper temperature improves layer fusion and strength
• Cooling rate - Controlled cooling can enhance crystallization and strength in some materials

For applications requiring maximum tensile strength, materials like nylon, polycarbonate, or carbon fiber composites are often preferred. However, these can be more challenging to print compared to PLA or PETG. The ideal material choice depends on balancing strength requirements with other factors like printability, cost, and post-processing needs.

PETG vs PLA Plus - enhanced strength options

While we've discussed standard PLA and PETG, it's worth exploring enhanced versions of these materials that offer improved strength characteristics. When comparing PETG vs PLA Plus, both materials offer enhanced strength over standard PLA, but with some key differences:

Tensile strength

PLA Plus typically has a higher tensile strength than PETG, with values around 60-65 MPa compared to 50-55 MPa for PETG. This means PLA Plus can withstand greater pulling forces before breaking.

Impact resistance

PETG is stronger than PLA Plus when it comes to impact resistance. PETG has better toughness and can absorb more energy from sudden impacts without shattering. This makes PETG more suitable for parts that may experience shocks or drops.

Temperature resistance

PETG has a higher heat deflection temperature than PLA Plus, typically around 70°C compared to 55-60°C for PLA Plus. This allows PETG parts to withstand higher temperatures before deforming.

Chemical resistance

PETG offers superior chemical resistance compared to PLA Plus. It can better withstand exposure to various solvents, oils, and other chemicals without degrading.

Printability

PLA Plus retains much of the easy printability of standard PLA, with low warping and good bed adhesion. PETG can be slightly more challenging to print, often requiring higher temperatures and more careful cooling control.

Applications

When considering PLA Plus vs PETG for a project:

• Choose PLA Plus for parts needing high tensile strength and easy printability
• Opt for PETG when impact resistance, temperature resistance, or chemical resistance are priorities

Both materials offer significant improvements over standard PLA for functional parts, with the best choice depending on the specific requirements of your application.

Resin vs filament - strength comparison in 3D printing

Moving beyond filament-based 3D printing, it's important to consider how resin-based 3D printing compares in terms of strength. When comparing the strength of 3D print resin vs filament materials, there are several key factors to consider:

Tensile strength

Resin-based 3D printing typically produces parts with higher tensile strength compared to most common filament materials. Standard photopolymer resins can achieve tensile strengths of 50-65 MPa, while engineering resins can exceed 80 MPa. In contrast, common filaments like PLA and PETG usually range from 40-60 MPa.

Impact resistance

Filament materials often have an advantage when it comes to impact resistance. Materials like ABS and nylon filaments exhibit better toughness and ability to absorb sudden impacts compared to most 3D printing resins, which tend to be more brittle.

Layer adhesion

Resin-printed parts generally have superior layer adhesion compared to filament-printed parts. The liquid resin fully fuses between layers during the curing process, resulting in more isotropic properties. Filament parts can have weaker bonding between layers, especially along the Z-axis.

Flexibility

Filament materials offer more options for flexible parts. While some flexible resins exist, filaments like TPU and TPE provide a wider range of flexibility and elasticity for applications requiring bendable or compressible components.

Heat resistance

High-temperature resins can achieve superior heat deflection temperatures compared to most common filaments. Engineering resins can withstand temperatures over 200°C, while materials like PLA and PETG typically soften around 60-80°C.

Precision and detail

Resin printing excels at producing highly detailed parts with smooth surface finishes. This precision can contribute to improved strength in small features and thin walls compared to filament printing.

In summary, resin-based 3D printing generally offers higher tensile strength, better layer adhesion, and finer detail, while filament printing provides advantages in impact resistance, flexibility options, and material variety. The optimal choice between 3D print resin vs filament depends on the specific strength requirements and intended application of the printed part.

Factors affecting 3D printed part strength

To conclude our comprehensive analysis of 3D printing strength, it's crucial to understand that material choice is just one factor in determining the overall strength of a printed part. When evaluating the 3D printing strength comparisonbetween materials like PLA, PETG, and ABS, several key factors come into play that influence the overall strength and durability of printed parts:

Print settings

• Layer height: Thinner layers generally produce stronger parts due to better layer adhesion, though at the cost of longer print times.
• Infill density: Higher infill percentages increase strength but use more material and take longer to print.
• Shell thickness: More perimeters improve strength, especially for parts under tension or bending forces.
• Print temperature: Proper temperature ensures good layer bonding without material degradation.

Part orientation

The orientation of a part during printing significantly affects its strength due to the anisotropic nature of 3D printed objects. Parts are typically strongest when forces align with the layer direction and weakest perpendicular to the layers.

Material properties

Different filaments have inherent strength characteristics:

• PLA: Known for high tensile strength but can be brittle. Many wonder how strong is PLA compared to other materials - it often outperforms ABS in pure tensile strength tests.
• PETG: Offers a good balance of strength and flexibility, with better impact resistance than PLA.
• ABS: Provides good impact resistance and heat tolerance, though lower tensile strength than PLA.

Environmental factors

Temperature, humidity, and UV exposure can all affect the long-term strength of 3D printed parts. PLA is particularly susceptible to heat deformation, while ABS and PETG offer better temperature resistance.

Post-processing techniques

Various post-processing methods can enhance part strength:

• Annealing: Heat-treating parts to improve layer adhesion and overall strength.
• Epoxy coating: Applying a protective layer to increase durability and impact resistance.
• Acetone smoothing (for ABS): Can improve surface finish and potentially increase strength.

By carefully considering these factors and optimizing print settings, material choice, and post-processing techniques, makers can significantly improve the strength and performance of their 3D printed parts across a wide range of applications.

For a more in-depth look at how different filaments compare in terms of strength and other properties, you can check out this comparison between PLA and ABS filaments.

Innovate with UltiMaker materials

We have partnered with over 60 leading materials companies, who have tested and optimized their materials for UltiMaker printers and published more than 280 print profiles on the UltiMaker Marketplace.

From easily printable polymers to specific filaments certified for engineering applications – UltiMaker offers the widest material choice on the market.