Resin vs FDM printing: Comparing 3D printing with SLA resin vs filament

3D printing has revolutionized manufacturing and prototyping across industries, with two prominent technologies emerging as frontrunners: resin-based stereolithography (SLA) and fused deposition modeling (FDM). These resin vs filament 3d printer methods offer distinct advantages for different applications, making it crucial to understand their key differences.

SLA printing utilizes a photosensitive liquid resin that is cured layer by layer using ultraviolet light. This process allows for exceptionally high resolution and smooth surface finishes, making it ideal for intricate designs and detailed prototypes. SLA printers can achieve layer heights as small as 25 microns, resulting in parts with minimal visible layer lines.

In contrast, FDM printing works by extruding melted thermoplastic filament through a nozzle, building up layers to form the final object. This method is known for its versatility, affordability, and ability to produce functional parts using a wide range of materials. FDM printers typically have larger build volumes than their SLA counterparts, making them suitable for creating larger prototypes and end-use parts. FDM and FFF are essentially the same technology, with FFF (Fused Filament Fabrication) being the more general term not tied to a specific trademark.

When considering SLA vs FDM, several factors come into play:

• Resolution and surface finish: SLA generally produces smoother, more detailed parts
• Material properties: FDM offers a broader range of functional materials
• Build size: FDM printers often have larger build volumes
• Post-processing: SLA parts require cleaning and post-curing
• Cost: FDM materials are typically less expensive than SLA resins

Understanding SLA printing is and how it compares to FDM is essential for choosing the right technology for specific applications. While SLA excels in producing high-resolution prototypes and detailed models, FDM is often preferred for creating durable, functional parts and larger objects. Both technologies continue to advance, offering makers and manufacturers powerful tools for bringing their ideas to life. To learn more about the various types of 3D printing technologies, including SLA and FDM, you can explore our comprehensive guide.

Print quality and resolution comparison

Building on our understanding of the basic principles, let's delve deeper into the print quality and resolution capabilities of resin and FDM technologies. When comparing resin vs FDM printing, one of the most significant differences lies in the level of detail and surface finish each method can achieve.

Resin printers can achieve layer heights as small as 25-50 microns, resulting in exceptionally smooth surfaces with minimal visible layer lines. This high resolution allows for the reproduction of intricate details and complex geometries. For example, professional SLA printers can produce walls as thin as 0.2 mm and embossed or engraved details as fine as 0.1-0.15 mm.

In contrast, FDM printers typically have layer heights ranging from 50-400 microns. While recent advancements have improved FDM resolution, these printers still struggle to match the fine detail capabilities of resin printing. FDM prints often exhibit visible layer lines and may require post-processing to achieve a smoother finish. The minimum feature size for FDM printers is generally around 0.8 mm for wall thickness and 0.6 mm for embossed or engraved details.

The resolution difference between resin vs 3D printer technologies using FDM becomes particularly apparent when printing small, detailed objects such as jewelry prototypes, dental models, or miniature figurines. Resin printers excel in these applications due to their ability to capture fine textures and sharp edges.

However, it's important to note that print quality is not solely determined by resolution. Other factors such as material properties, printer calibration, and post-processing techniques also play crucial roles in the final output quality of both 3D print resin vs filament methods.

For applications requiring high precision and tight tolerances, resin printing often has an advantage. The UV curing process used in resin printing can achieve more consistent dimensional accuracy compared to the thermal extrusion method of FDM, which may be subject to warping or shrinkage as the material cools.

While FDM technology may lag behind in terms of resolution, it offers other benefits such as a wider range of material options, larger build volumes, and often faster print times for less detailed objects. The choice between resin and FDM printing ultimately depends on the specific requirements of each project, balancing factors like detail needs, material properties, and production volume. For a more in-depth comparison of these technologies, you can refer to our article on FDM vs SLA printing.

Material properties and strength

As we transition from discussing print quality to material characteristics, it's important to understand how the properties of resin and FDM materials impact the strength and functionality of printed parts. When comparing resin vs PLA and other filament materials used in FDM printing, there are several key differences to consider:

Resin materials used in SLA printing typically offer higher detail and resolution compared to FDM filaments. The liquid resin can be cured in very fine layers, allowing for smoother surfaces and the ability to produce intricate features. However, standard resins tend to be more brittle than common FDM materials like PLA.

PLA filament used in FDM printing is known for its ease of use and biodegradability. It produces parts with good layer adhesion and dimensional accuracy. While PLA offers decent strength for many applications, it is not as impact-resistant as some other FDM materials like ABS or PETG.

A noteworthy aspect when evaluating PLA vs resin is that engineering resins have been developed to match or exceed the mechanical properties of common FDM filaments. For example, some tough resins can achieve similar or greater tensile strength and impact resistance compared to PLA or ABS.

FDM materials like nylon, polycarbonate, and carbon fiber-filled filaments can produce extremely strong and durable parts. These engineering-grade filaments often outperform standard resins in terms of impact strength, heat resistance, and overall toughness.

When considering FDM vs resin for functional parts, key factors include:

• Tensile strength: Engineering resins can match or exceed many FDM materials
• Impact resistance: FDM materials like ABS and nylon tend to be more impact-resistant than standard resins
• Heat resistance: High-temperature resins and engineering FDM filaments offer the best heat deflection properties
• Flexibility: Both technologies offer flexible material options, with TPU for FDM and flexible resins for SLA
• Chemical resistance: Specialized resins and filaments are available for chemical resistance applications

Of particular significance is that material properties can vary widely between different formulations within each technology. For FDM, factors like infill percentage and print orientation also impact part strength. With resin printing, post-curing processes play a crucial role in achieving optimal mechanical properties.

Ultimately, the choice between resin and FDM materials depends on the specific application requirements. For highly detailed parts with good surface finish, resin often excels. For larger functional parts requiring durability, engineering-grade FDM filaments may be preferable. In many cases, a combination of both technologies can be optimal for different components within a project. To learn more about the various materials available for 3D printing and their applications, you can explore our guide on 3D printed materials and their uses.

Cost analysis - initial investment and ongoing expenses

Having explored the material properties of resin and FDM printing, it's crucial to consider the financial aspects of these technologies. When comparing resin vs filament 3D printing, the cost analysis involves examining both initial investments and ongoing expenses. Understanding these factors is crucial for makers and businesses to determine the most cost-effective solution for their needs.

Initial investment for FDM printers:

• Entry-level FDM printers: €175–€270
• Professional desktop FDM printers: €1750–€7000
• Industrial FDM systems: €13000+

Initial investment for resin printers:

• Low-cost resin printers: €175–€885
• Professional SLA printers: €2200–€8850
• Large-format resin printers: €4400–€22000

A key aspect of the 3D printer filament vs resin cost comparison is the price of materials. FDM filaments are generally less expensive, with standard materials like PLA and ABS costing €18–€45 per kilogram. Specialized engineering filaments can range from €45–€135 per kilogram.

Resin materials tend to be pricier:

• Standard resins: €45–€90per liter
• Specialized engineering resins: €90–€265 per liter

Of particular significance in the ongoing expenses are the additional costs associated with resin or filament 3D printer operation. Resin printing requires more post-processing equipment and consumables, including:

• Wash and cure stations: €175–€440
• Isopropyl alcohol for cleaning: €9–€18 per gallon
• Disposable gloves and filters: €45–€90 per year
• Replacement FEP films: €17–€44 each

FDM printing has fewer additional expenses, but may require:

• Replacement nozzles: €9–€27 each
• Build plate adhesives: €9–€18 per bottle
• Maintenance tools: €44–€88 one-time cost

A noteworthy consideration is the labor cost associated with post-processing. Resin prints often require more hands-on time for cleaning and curing, which can increase overall production costs. FDM prints may need support removal and surface finishing, but generally require less post-processing time.

When evaluating long-term costs, it's crucial to factor in the printer's efficiency and reliability. While FDM printers may have lower material costs, resin printers can often produce multiple small parts simultaneously, potentially offsetting the higher resin prices with increased productivity for certain applications.

Ultimately, the choice between resin vs filament 3D printing from a cost perspective depends on the specific use case, production volume, and required part quality. For hobbyists and low-volume production, FDM may offer a more affordable entry point. However, for businesses requiring high-detail parts or larger production runs, the higher initial investment in resin printing could be justified by superior part quality and potential long-term efficiency gains.

Printing speed and efficiency

Moving from cost considerations to operational efficiency, it's important to examine how resin and FDM technologies compare in terms of printing speed and overall productivity. When comparing FDM vs resin printing, speed and efficiency are important factors to consider. Both technologies have their strengths and limitations in this area.

FDM 3D printers generally offer faster print speeds for larger objects. The extrusion process allows for quick deposition of material, especially when using thicker layer heights. For example, an FDM printer can typically produce a simple 100mm cube in 2-3 hours. However, print speed decreases significantly when printing at higher resolutions or with more complex geometries.

In contrast, resin 3d printers excel at producing small, highly detailed objects quickly. The layer-by-layer curing process of SLA or DLP resin printers allows for consistent print times regardless of part complexity. A detailed 50mm figurine may print in just 1-2 hours on a resin printer.

A key aspect of efficiency to consider is the post-processing required. FDM prints often need minimal post-processing, perhaps just removing support structures. Resin printer vs filament workflows differ significantly here - resin prints require washing in isopropyl alcohol and post-curing under UV light, which adds time to the overall process.

For batch production, resin printers have an advantage. Their build platforms allow for printing multiple small parts simultaneously without impacting overall print time. An FDM printer would need to print objects sequentially, increasing total production time.

Of particular significance is the impact of print failures on efficiency. FDM printers allow for easier recovery from failed prints, as the process can often be paused and resumed. Resin print failures typically result in wasted material and a complete restart.

When considering resin 3d printer vs filament options for speed and efficiency, the choice depends largely on the specific use case:

• For large, simple objects: FDM printers are generally faster
• For small, detailed parts: Resin printers offer superior speed
• For batch production of small parts: Resin printers are more efficient
• For minimal post-processing: FDM printers have the advantage

Ultimately, the most efficient choice will depend on factors like part size, complexity, required detail, and production volume. Both FDM and resin printing technologies continue to advance, with newer models offering improved speeds and efficiencies across various applications.

Ease of use and post-processing requirements

As we transition from discussing printing speed to user experience, it's essential to consider the ease of use and post-processing requirements for both resin and FDM technologies. When comparing resin vs FDM printers, these factors can significantly impact workflow efficiency and overall user satisfaction.

FDM printers are generally considered more user-friendly, especially for beginners. The printing process is straightforward - simply load the filament, prepare the model in slicing software, and start printing. Post-processing for FDM prints typically involves:

• Removing support structures (if used)
• Light sanding to smooth layer lines
• Optional painting or other surface treatments

In contrast, resin printers require more careful handling and post-processing steps. The workflow for resin printing includes:

• Pouring liquid resin into the vat
• Printing the model
• Removing the print from the build plate
• Washing the print in isopropyl alcohol to remove uncured resin
• Post-curing the print under UV light
• Removing support structures
• Optional sanding of support marks

A key aspect of FDM vs sla printing is the safety considerations. FDM printing is generally safer, with minimal exposure to harmful chemicals. Resin printing requires more safety precautions, including:

• Wearing nitrile gloves when handling uncured resin
• Using eye protection
• Ensuring proper ventilation in the printing area
• Carefully disposing of waste resin and cleaning materials

Of particular significance is the time investment required for post-processing. While FDM prints can often be used right off the printer, resin prints always require washing and post-curing steps. This can add considerable time to the overall printing process.

However, the extra effort in post-processing for resin prints often results in superior surface finish and detail. Resin printer vs FDM comparisons typically show that resin prints have smoother surfaces and finer details, which can be crucial for certain applications like jewelry or miniature figurines.

Noteworthy is the difference in mess and cleanup between the two technologies. FDM printing is relatively clean, with minimal waste beyond support materials. Resin printing can be messier, requiring careful handling of liquid resin and thorough cleaning of tools and the print area to prevent contamination.

For those new to 3D printing, FDM technology offers a gentler learning curve and simpler workflow. However, for users willing to invest time in learning proper techniques and safety protocols, resin printing can produce exceptional results with a higher level of detail and surface quality.

Applications and use cases

Building on our understanding of the operational aspects of resin and FDM printing, let's explore how these technologies are applied in various fields. When comparing resin 3d printers vs filament technologies, each excels in different applications and use cases. Understanding these strengths can help determine which technology is best suited for specific projects.

Resin 3D printing is ideal for:

• Highly detailed miniatures and figurines
• Jewelry prototyping and casting
• Dental models and appliances
• Intricate architectural models
• Precise engineering prototypes

The superior resolution and smooth surface finish of resin prints make them perfect for applications requiring fine details and aesthetics. For example, tabletop gaming enthusiasts often prefer resin printers for creating highly detailed miniatures with crisp features.

Filament vs resin 3d printer comparisons show that FDM technology is better suited for:

• Functional prototypes and end-use parts
• Large-scale models and props
• Durable tools and fixtures
• Rapid prototyping for form and fit testing
• Educational projects and hobbyist creations

FDM's ability to use a wide range of materials, including engineering-grade thermoplastics, makes it ideal for creating strong, functional parts. For instance, automotive companies often use FDM to produce custom tools and jigs for assembly lines.

A key aspect of choosing between 3d printer vs resin technologies is considering the intended use of the printed objects. Resin printers excel in creating parts for visual presentation or highly accurate prototypes, while FDM printers are better for producing durable, functional components.

Of particular significance is the application of these technologies in different industries:

• Medical: Resin printers are often used for creating anatomical models and surgical guides due to their high accuracy.
• Aerospace: FDM is preferred for producing lightweight yet strong components and tooling.
• Consumer products: Both technologies find use, with resin for detailed prototypes and FDM for functional testing models.
• Education: FDM printers are commonly found in schools due to their ease of use and lower material costs.

Noteworthy is the trend of combining both technologies in professional settings. Many businesses utilize resin printers for detailed design iterations and FDM for larger, functional prototypes, leveraging the strengths of each technology throughout the product development cycle.

Conclusion - choosing between resin and FDM printing

As we conclude our comprehensive comparison of resin and FDM 3D printing technologies, it's clear that each method has its unique strengths and applications.

When deciding between resin vs FDM 3D printing technologies, several key factors should be considered:

• Print quality and resolution: Resin printers generally produce higher detail and smoother surfaces compared to FDM, making them ideal for intricate models and prototypes.
• Material properties: FDM offers a wider range of functional materials, including engineering-grade thermoplastics, while resin printers excel with specialized formulations for specific applications.
• Build size: FDM printers typically have larger build volumes, suitable for bigger parts or higher production volumes.
• Speed and efficiency: While print speeds vary, FDM can be faster for larger, simpler objects, whereas resin printers may have an advantage for small, detailed parts.
• Post-processing: Resin prints require more extensive post-processing, including washing and curing, while FDM parts often need support removal and surface finishing.

A key aspect to consider is the intended use of the printed objects. SLA vs FDM comparisons show that resin printing is superior for applications requiring high precision and smooth finishes, such as jewelry prototypes or dental models. FDM, on the other hand, is better suited for functional prototypes, end-use parts, and larger objects where surface detail is less critical.

Of particular significance is the cost analysis. While FDM printers and materials are generally less expensive, the overall cost-effectiveness depends on factors like production volume, part complexity, and required quality. For some applications, the higher initial investment in resin printing may be justified by superior part quality and potential long-term efficiency gains.

Noteworthy is the trend of combining both technologies in professional settings. Many businesses utilize resin vs filament 3D printer options to leverage the strengths of each technology throughout the product development cycle. Resin printers may be used for detailed design iterations, while FDM printers produce larger, functional prototypes or end-use parts.

Ultimately, the choice between resin and FDM printing depends on balancing factors such as required part quality, material properties, production volume, and budget constraints. By carefully evaluating these aspects, users can select the most appropriate technology for their specific needs, whether for rapid prototyping, small-batch production, or specialized applications across various industries.

If you are looking for a European-made FDM printer, UltiMaker delivers quality and speed. Access the whole UltiMaker Ecosystem, from Digital Factory to Cura and unlock new innovations and smarter solutions.